Forums >> StudioSysAdmins Lists (posts via e-mail only) >> Discuss@StudioSysAdmins.com


Re: Anti-Trust Apple Investigation.


However, if it wasn't in the interests of content providers to provide ways to buy their content outside of iTunes, they wouldn't have done it in the first place; so as far as many content providers were concerned, the pros of not going through iTunes outweighed the cons of the risk to the iTunes channel itself.

Well honestly.  100% profit versus 70%?  I'm going to choose 100% all the time because that benefits me, the manu, the most.  As a manufacturer I might not care so much about the longevity of the channels I use, because the product I sell might not have that much longevity or its outlived several channels.  The channel itself however will want to remain viable as long as possible.

You certainly might choose 100%, but how many distribution channels allow a manufacturer/creator 100% profit? Car boot sales? Nope. Entrance fee. Self hosted web shop? No. Hosting, design, merchant/PayPal and other fees. 

I can't recall who it was, but one Mac software manufacturer said they were jumping on the Mac App Store bandwagon because 30% of their app revenue was in a similar vein to their hosting/merchant payment systems and the suchlike. A few magazines have come out and said the subscription slice (again, 30%) wasn't that bad because most print distribution apparently costs somewhere in that region (however I have no way of knowing if that's fact or not).

The thing that gets me the most about the whole App Store thing is the complete and utter lack of support for upgrade pricing, as mentioned by Panic, who are apparently still utterly confused by the matter.

    Contests/Surveys
  • ** COMING SOON **

TopofBlogs